Autoimmune central nervous system disorders: Antibody testing and its clinical utility.

A rapidly expanding repertoire of neural antibody biomarkers exists for autoimmune central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Following clinical recognition of an autoimmune CNS disorder, the detection of a neural antibody facilitates diagnosis and informs prognosis and management. This review considers the phenotypes, diagnostic assay methodologies, and clinical utility of neural antibodies in autoimmune CNS disorders. Autoimmune CNS disorders may present with a diverse range of clinical features. Clinical phenotype should inform the neural antibodies selected for testing via the use of phenotype-specific panels. Both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are preferred in the vast majority of cases but for some analytes either CSF (e.g. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor [NMDA-R] IgG) or serum (e.g. aquaporin-4 [AQP4] IgG) specimens may be preferred. Screening using 2 methods is recommended for most analytes, particularly paraneoplastic antibodies. We utilize murine tissue-based indirect immunofluorescence assay (TIFA) with subsequent confirmatory protein-specific testing. The cellular location of the target antigen informs choice of confirmatory diagnostic assay (e.g. blot for intracellular antigens such as Hu; cell-based assay for cell surface targets such as leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 [LGI1]). Titers of positive results have limited diagnostic utility with the exception of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) 65 IgG autoimmunity, which is associated with neurological disease at higher values. While novel antibodies are typically discovered using established techniques such as TIFA and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry, more recent high-throughput molecular technologies (such as protein microarray and phage-display immunoprecipitation sequencing) may expedite the process of antibody discovery. Individual neural antibodies inform the clinician regarding the clinical associations, oncological risk stratification and tumor histology, the likely prognosis, and immunotherapy choice. In the era of neural antibody biomarkers for autoimmune CNS disorders, access to appropriate laboratory assays for neural antibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and management of these disorders.

Seroprevalence of neuronal antibodies in diseases mimicking autoimmune encephalitis.

Detection of neuronal antibodies for autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes relies on commercially available cell-based assays and lineblots. However, lineblots may reveal the presence of neuronal antibodies in patients with various non-autoimmune etiologies. Herein we describe patients with non-autoimmune etiologies (cohort B) and detectable neuronal antibodies and compare them to definite cases of autoimmune encephalitis (cohort A) for differences in clinical data. All patients positive for at least one neuronal antibody were retrospectively evaluated for autoimmune encephalitis and/or paraneoplastic neurological syndrome between 2016 and 2022. 39 cases in cohort B and 23 in cohort A were identified. In cohort B, most common diagnoses were neurodegenerative disorders in 9/39 (23.1%), brain tumors in 6/39 (15.4%) while most common detected antibodies were anti-titin (N10), anti-recoverin (N11), anti-Yo (N8) and all were detected in serum only. Differential aspects between cohort A and B were CSF pleocytosis (14/23 (60.8%) vs 11/35 (31.4%), p = 0.042, respectively), MRI features suggestive of encephalitis (6/23 (26.1%) vs 0 (0%), p = 0.002, respectively) and epilepsy restricted to temporal lobes (14/23 (60.9%) vs 2/30 (6.7%), p = 0.0003, respectively). A large proportion of lineblot results were non-specific when only serum was tested and were frequently found in non-autoimmune neurological conditions.

Autoimmune and inflammatory neurological disorders in the intensive care unit.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review summarizes the diagnostic approach to autoimmune encephalitis (AE) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and provides practical guidance on therapeutic management. RECENT FINDINGS: Autoimmune encephalitis represents a group of immune-mediated brain diseases associated with antibodies that are pathogenic against central nervous system proteins. Recent findings suggests that the diagnosis of AE requires a multidisciplinary approach including appropriate recognition of common clinical syndromes, brain imaging and electroencephalography to confirm focal pathology, and cerebrospinal fluid and serum tests to rule out common brain infections, and to detect autoantibodies. ICU admission may be necessary at AE onset because of altered mental status, refractory seizures, and/or dysautonomia. Early management in ICU includes prompt initiation of immunotherapy, detection and treatment of seizures, and supportive care with neuromonitoring. In parallel, screening for neoplasm should be systematically performed. Despite severe presentation, epidemiological studies suggest that functional recovery is likely under appropriate therapy, even after prolonged ICU stays. CONCLUSION: AE and related disorders are increasingly recognized in the ICU population. Critical care physicians should be aware of these conditions and consider them early in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with unexplained encephalopathy. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory for diagnosis, ICU management, specific therapy, and prognostication.

Dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria: A clue to early diagnosis of Aicardi-Goutières syndrome.

A 6-year-old female with a history of Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS) presented to dermatology clinic with hypopigmented and hyperpigmented macules and patches consistent with dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria (DSH). Previous genetic workup demonstrated a de novo, heterozygous mutation in the adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR) gene. While the co-occurrence of AGS and DSH has previously been described in mutations of the ADAR gene, our case highlights the potential association between these disorders that may aid in earlier future diagnosis of AGS.

General features, pathogenesis, and laboratory diagnostics of autoimmune encephalitis.

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a group of inflammatory conditions that can associate with the presence of antibodies directed to neuronal intracellular, or cell surface antigens. These disorders are increasingly recognized as an important differential diagnosis of infectious encephalitis and of other common neuropsychiatric conditions. Autoantibody diagnostics plays a pivotal role for accurate diagnosis of AE, which is of utmost importance for the prompt recognition and early treatment. Several AE subgroups can be identified, either according to the prominent clinical phenotype, presence of a concomitant tumor, or type of neuronal autoantibody, and recent diagnostic criteria have provided important insights into AE classification. Antibodies to neuronal intracellular antigens typically associate with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and poor prognosis, whereas antibodies to synaptic/neuronal cell surface antigens characterize many AE subtypes that associate with tumors less frequently, and that are often immunotherapy-responsive. In addition to the general features of AE, we review current knowledge on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying these disorders, focusing mainly on the potential role of neuronal antibodies in the most frequent conditions, and highlight current theories and controversies. Then, we dissect the crucial aspects of the laboratory diagnostics of neuronal antibodies, which represents an actual challenge for both pathologists and neurologists. Indeed, this diagnostics entails technical difficulties, along with particularly interesting novel features and pitfalls. The novelties especially apply to the wide range of assays used, including specific tissue-based and cell-based assays. These assays can be developed in-house, usually in specialized laboratories, or are commercially available. They are widely used in clinical immunology and in clinical chemistry laboratories, with relevant differences in analytic performance. Indeed, several data indicate that in-house assays could perform better than commercial kits, notwithstanding that the former are based on non-standardized protocols. Moreover, they need expertise and laboratory facilities usually unavailable in clinical chemistry laboratories. Together with the data of the literature, we critically evaluate the analytical performance of the in-house vs commercial kit-based approach. Finally, we propose an algorithm aimed at integrating the present strategies of the laboratory diagnostics in AE for the best clinical management of patients with these disorders.

Looking Beyond Syndrome-Based Criteria for Autoimmune Encephalitis-The Need for Complementary Neural Antibody-Based Diagnostic Criteria.

This Viewpoint discusses how neural antibody­based diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis would complement the syndrome-based diagnostic algorithm to improve sensitivity while maintaining high specificity.

Autonomic nervous system involvement in autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes.

In autoimmune neurological diseases, the autonomic nervous system can be the primary target of autoimmunity (e.g. autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy), or, more frequently, be damaged together with other areas of the nervous system (e.g. Guillain-Barré syndrome). Patients with autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) often develop dysautonomia; however, the frequency and spectrum of autonomic signs and symptoms remain ill defined except for those scenarios in which dysautonomia is a core feature of the disease. Such is the case of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, Morvan syndrome or anti-NMDAR encephalitis; in the latter, patients with dysautonomia have been reported to carry a more severe disease and to retain higher disability than those without autonomic dysfunction. Likewise, the presence of autonomic involvement indicates a higher risk of death due to neurological cause in patients with anti-Hu PNS. However, in anti-Hu and other PNS, as well as in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitors' toxicities, the characterization of autonomic involvement is frequently overshadowed by the severity of other neurological symptoms and signs. When evaluated with tests specific for autonomic function, patients with autoimmune encephalitis or PNS usually show a more widespread autonomic involvement than clinically suggested, which may reflect a potential gap of care when it comes to diagnosing dysautonomia. This review aims to revise the autonomic involvement in patients with autoimmune encephalitis and PNS, using for that purpose an antibody-based approach. We also discuss and provide general recommendations for the evaluation and management of dysautonomia in these patients.

Antibody-Negative Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) refers to a heterogenous group of inflammatory CNS diseases. Subgroups with specified neural autoantibodies are more homogeneous in presentation, trigger factors, outcome, and response to therapy. However, a considerable fraction of patients has AE features but does not harbor detectable autoantibodies and is referred to as antibody-negative AE. Our aim was to describe clinical features, trigger factors, treatments, and outcome of a cohort of comprehensively tested antibody-negative AE patients. METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study recruited adult patients whose serum and/or CSF was sent to our tertiary center for neural antibody testing between 2011 and 2020, who entered the diagnostic algorithm as possible antibody-negative AE and had the following: (1) probable antibody-negative AE, definite antibody-negative acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), or definite autoimmune limbic encephalitis (LE) according to diagnostic criteria; (2) available data on MRI of the brain, CSF, and EEG; and (3) stored serum and/or CSF samples. These samples were reanalyzed using a comprehensive combination of cell-based and tissue-based assays. RESULTS: Of 2,250 patients tested, 33 (1.5%) were classified as possible antibody-negative AE. Of these, 5 were found to have antibodies by comprehensive testing, 5 fulfilled the criteria of probable AE (3F:2M, median age 67, range 42-67), 4 of definite autoimmune LE (2F:2M, median age 45.5, range 27-60 years), one of definite antibody-negative ADEM, 2 of Hashimoto encephalopathy, one had no samples available for additional testing, and 15 had no further categorization. Of 10 probable/definite AE/LE/ADEM, one had a malignancy and none of them received an alternative diagnosis until the end of follow-up (median 18 months). In total, 80% (8/10) of patients received immunotherapy including corticosteroids, and 6/10 (60%) patients received rituximab, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, or IV immunoglobulins. Five (50%) patients improved, one (10%) stabilized, one (10%) worsened, and 3 (30%) died. All deaths were considered to be related to encephalitis. We did not observe differences of immunotherapy-treated patients in likelihood of improvement with or without nonsteroidal immunotherapy (with 2/6, without 1/2). DISCUSSION: Antibody-negative AE should be diagnosed only after comprehensive testing. Diagnostic effort is important because many patients benefit from immunotherapy and some have malignancies.

Validation of different predictive scoring scales in patients with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy related to neuronal surface antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the different predictive scoring scales in the Chinese population with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy of unknown etiology related to neuronal surface antibody (Ab)-mediated autoimmune encephalitis (AE). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 174 consecutive patients from October 2018 to December 2022, whose serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples were tested for neuronal surface Abs. The antibody prevalence in epilepsy and encephalopathy (APE2), antibodies contributing to focal epilepsy signs and symptoms (ACES), "obvious" indications for neural antibody testing in epilepsy or seizures (ONES) checklist, and the combinations were used to validate the predictive models of neuronal surface Ab-mediated AE. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy of unknown etiology were enrolled. Abs were detected in 37 patients (26.6%). The APE2/ONES reflex score had the highest sensitivity (89.2%) and lowest specificity (41.7%). The ACES score had the lowest sensitivity (67.5%) and highest specificity (64.7%). Variations in the performance were observed in the different types of AE. 100% of patients with anti-γ-aminobutyric acid B-B receptor encephalitis were predicted by ONES, APE2/ONES reflex, and ACES/ONES reflex scores. Only 75% of patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis were predicted by the APE2/ONES and ACES/ONES reflex scores. CONCLUSION: Our study was the first to validate various predictive scoring scales in the Chinese cohort of patients with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy of unknown etiology related to neuronal surface Ab-mediated AE. Based upon clinical suspicion, more than one scoring scale should be performed to predict the chance of AE in those patients.

Overlapping Epstein-Barr virus encephalitis and autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy.

We describe three cases of overlapping Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) Encephalitis and Autoimmune Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Astrocytopathy (GFAP-A). The three cases all presented with initial symptoms of fever, headache, coma, and posture tremor of the upper limbs, then followed by limb weakness and dysuria. All of the three cases were on ventilators. Case 1 and 2 improved dramatically after intravenous methylprednisoloneand immunoglobulin treatment. However, case 3 presented dyspneic, and died from gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The GFAP-A triggered by EBV intracranial infection could initially masquerade as EBV encephalitis only, and the detection of GFAP antibody is essential for differentiation.

An updated review of pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with Streptococcus/pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome, also known as idiopathic autoimmune encephalitis: What the allergist should know.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome, further subcategorized as pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcus, is a form of idiopathic autoimmune encephalitis (IAE). Poststreptococcal autoimmunity seen in Idiopathic autoimmune encephalitis manifests as various neuropsychiatric symptoms such as obsessive rituals, tics, anxiety, depression, and many others. Idiopathic autoimmune encephalitis has clinically heterogeneous phenotypes that make accurate diagnosing difficult, although diagnostic testing such as the Cunningham Panel increases the likelihood of finding effective treatments. Current recommended treatments include psychiatric medication, behavioral intervention, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory therapy, and immunomodulating therapy. OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated review on the diagnosis, management, and treatment of pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorder associated with streptococcus and pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric syndrome, also referred to as IAE. RESULTS: Information from 47 sources was used to outline current knowledge of IAE pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and epidemiology, and to outline diagnostic recommendations and current treatment guidelines. Gaps in knowledge, in addition to current controversy, were also outlined to provide a thorough background of this condition and future needs for IAE research. CONCLUSION: Owing to the complexity and variability in ways patients with IAE may present to the allergist/immunologist office, an interdisciplinary approach is imperative to provide patients with the best medical care. Still, more research is needed to further elucidate the mechanism(s) and optimal treatment algorithm for IAE to facilitate broader recognition and acceptance of this condition by the medical community.

Clinical study of autonomic dysfunction in patients with autoimmune encephalitis.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a collective name, covering an emerging spectrum of autoimmune-mediated neurological diseases related to antibodies and synaptic or intracellular proteins. Anti-NMDAR, anti-LGI1, and anti-GABABR are three types of neuronal cell surface antibodies. Autonomic dysfunction represents a frequently occurring clinical manifestation. This observational study purposes to investigate comparisons between two groups with or without autonomic dysfunction and detect the autonomic dysfunction and other indexes in anti-NMDAR, anti-LGI1, and anti-GABABR cohorts. METHODS: Patients with anti-NMDAR, anti-LGI1 and anti-GABABR encephalitis were recruited from the May 2017 to the April 2022. The following information was recorded: age, age at onset, tumor presence, gender, prodromal symptoms, clinical manifestations, cranial magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid and blood examinations, and immunotherapy. RESULTS: There were totally 161 patients enrolled in this study. Among these participants, 104 individuals (64.6%) presented autonomic dysfunction and the remaining 57 (35.4%) were free of autonomic dysfunction. Sinus tachycardia was the most common autonomic dysfunction, followed by pollakiuria/uroclepsia, feverscence, central hypoventilation, sinus bradycardia, constipation, uroschesis, hyperhidrosis, hypersalivation, hypotension, and early satiety/emesis. Compared to patients without autonomic dysfunction, those with autonomic dysfunction had a higher incidence of central hypoventilation and ICU admissions. Meanwhile, in both groups with or without autonomic dysfunction, meatal behavior disorder, cognitive impairment, and epileptic seizure were three most common clinical manifestations. There were no significant differences in cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination, antibody titers and number of immunotherapy types. Further analysis of AE mediated by distinct neuronal surface antibodies demonstrated that there were 85 anti-NMDAR, 56 anti-LGI1, and 20 anti-GABABR encephalitis patients. The significant differences between these three cohorts appeared in age, tumor presence, fervescence presence and antibody titers. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the comparisons between autonomic dysfunction group and autonomic dysfunction-free group and provided insights into better diagnosis and treatment.

Utility of Protein Microarrays for Detection of Classified and Novel Antibodies in Autoimmune Neurologic Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neural antibodies are detected by tissue-based indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) in Mayo Clinic's Neuroimmunology Laboratory practice, but the process of characterizing and validating novel antibodies is lengthy. We report our assessment of human protein arrays. METHODS: Assessment of arrays (81% human proteome coverage) was undertaken using diverse known positive samples (17 serum and 14 CSF). Samples from patients with novel neural antibodies were reflexed from IFA to arrays. Confirmatory assays were cell-based (CBA) or line blot. Epitope mapping was undertaken using phage display immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhiPSeq). RESULTS: Control positive samples known to be reactive with linear epitopes of intracellular antigens (e.g., ANNA-1 [anti-Hu]) were readily identified by arrays in 20 of 21 samples. By contrast, 10 positive controls known to be enriched with antibodies against cell surface protein conformational epitopes (e.g., GluN1 subunit of NMDA-R) were indistinguishable from background signal. Three antibodies, previously characterized by other investigators (but unclassified in our laboratory), were unmasked in 4 patients using arrays (July-December 2022): Neurexin-3α, 1 patient; regulator of gene protein signaling (RGS)8, 1 patient; and seizure-related homolog like 2 (SEZ6L2), 2 patients. All were accompanied by previously reported phenotypes (encephalitis, 1; cerebellar ataxia, 3). Patient 1 had subacute onset of seizures and encephalopathy. Neurexin-3α ranked high in CSF (second ranked neural protein) but low in serum (660th overall). Neurexin-3α CBA was positive in both samples. Patient 2 presented with rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia. RGS8 ranked the highest neural protein in available CSF sample by array (third overall). RGS8-specific line blot was positive. Patients 3 and 4 had rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia. SEZ6L2 was the highest ranked neural antigen by arrays in all samples (CSF, 1, serum, 2; Patient 3, ranked 9th overall in CSF, 11th in serum; Patient 4, 6th overall in serum]). By PhIPSeq, diverse neurexin-3α epitopes (including cell surface) were detected in CSF from patient 1, but no SEZ6L2 peptides were detected for serum or CSF samples from Patient 3. DISCUSSION: Individualized autoimmune neurologic diagnoses may be accelerated using protein arrays. They are optimal for detection of intracellular antigen-reactive antibodies, though certain cell surface-directed antibodies (neurexin-3α and SEZ6L2) may also be detected.

The Diagnostic Challenge and Prognosis of Autoimmune Encephalitis in Children: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is an immune-mediated encephalitis; nevertheless, its diagnosis in children remains challenging. This study aimed to reveal the clinical characteristics, diagnostic processes, and therapeutic outcomes of AE in children. METHODS: A total of 18 children with AE were enrolled. Antibody assay was performed in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum samples by indirect immunofluorescence. Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were monitored to reflect abnormal neural signals. In addition, demographics data, neurological symptoms, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Convulsion (50.00%) and emotional disturbance (44.44%) were common clinical symptoms of AE. The biochemical parameters in the CSF had a relatively low diagnostic value. Antibodies in the CSF were dominant in the diagnosis of AE but those in the serum were limited in the diagnosis of anti-MOG or anti-LGI1 AE. In addition, all children showed abnormalities in EEG (72.22%) or MRI (66.67%). Methylprednisolone combined with sequential oral prednisone (83.33%) and gamma globulin (88.89%) were the dominant drugs, achieving an overall recovery rate of 72.22%. However, there were still two patients who had poor outcomes, including Patient 3 with a young age (two years old) and progressive symptom and Patient 12 with a long disease course before treatment (>120 days). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical manifestations of AE are varied in children. Antibody in the CSF was dominant, and EEG and MRI were instructive in the diagnosis of AE. Young age, progressive symptom, and prolonged disease course before treatment may contribute to poor outcomes.

Clinical characteristics of Leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis in a 6-year-old girl: case report and literature reviews.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune encephalitis related to the leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1(LGI1) antibody is the most prevalent in older adults, manifesting as seizures, faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS), cognitive impairment, memory disturbance, hyponatremia and neuropsychiatric disorders. However the data pertaining to children affected by the disease is still limited. CASE PRESENTATION AND LITERATURE REVIEWS: This study presents a detailed report of a 6-year-old Chinese girl who experienced nose aches and faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS). Electrolyte testing revealed that she had hyponatremia and brain MRI showed an abnormality in the left temporal pole. Additionally, anti-LGI1 antibodies were detected in both her serum (1:100) and CSF (1:30). The patient was treated with immunotherapy and symptom management, which proved effective. Furthermore, we provide a summary of 25 pediatric cases of anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Pediatric patients rarely exhibited FBDS and hyponatremia, and some cases presented with isolated syndromes. But the therapeutic outcomes of pediatric patients were generally good. CONCLUSIONS: In this report, we describe a patient who developed a rare symptom of nose aches possibly as one of symptoms of anti-LGI1 encephalitis, which highlights the possibility of atypical symptoms in children that may be misdiagnosed. Reviewing the literature, the clinical features differed between pediatric and adult cases. Therefore, it is crucial to collect and analyze data from more cases to promote accurate diagnosis and timely treatment.